The posting by Jim Ludwig of Darksword of the latest pictures of figures in the ‘Song of Ice and Fire’ range has brought up some interesting points about figures and photography I thought it might be useful to explore.

In figure #1 we see the difference in apparent proportions caused by different camera angles with respect to a figure. The level of the head and shoulders is the same but there is a gradual distortion as we go lower down until the hips appear to be in a quite different place. In a photo with no frame of reference it is difficult to tell the angle of the camera and how close to the figure the lens was. The effect is frequently to foreshorten the lower half of the figure without the viewer being aware of it.

The length of women’s legs is so regularly distorted in representations it is common, for men particularly, to think it normal for a woman’s legs to be a good deal more than half her height. In fact on average they are a bit less than half (see figure #2). High heeled shoes, which aid the illusion are a relatively recent invention, appearing for men in the mid 16th century (to help keep feet in stirrups) and adopted by women shortly thereafter, though in women’s case it was not to accentuate the legs, which were not exposed, but to increase overall height.

The third picture is a teaser for ser Loras.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Trackbacks

    No Trackbacks

Comments

Display comments as (Linear | Threaded)

  1. Yannick Vierron says:

    Your work on asoiaf miniatures is the best I've ever seen.

    You're actually THE great master in sculpting miniatures...

    I hope you will soon scuplt Tyrion and his bodyguard Bronn.

  2. Simon says:

    It actually goes without saying. Must feel good, Tom!

  3. Ming-hua says:

    Hi, figures are looking good. Any chance of a better detail picture of the textrue on the man's mantle?

    Interesting note you made on length of the legs. I suppose it's kind of an engrained ideal or so. You also see it back in graphical art. Especially fashion drawing. Though I'm wondering if the later is also to simulate the effect when looking up onto a catwalk.

    By the way, it was great meeting you at Gencon and going to the classes.

  4. Tom says:

    The cloak is supposed to be covered in Forget-Me-Nots which are very small flowers, so it's just a texture in this scale. The picture is about as much resolution as I can get.

    I'm glad you liked the classes, sculpting is such a huge subject, I just hope I was able to convey a few useful points.

  5. Wendy says:

    Thanks for sharing that. I had noticed the problem of camera angles while taking a pic of a WIP. The head on my guy is a little small to begin with according to some (around 7.5 heads to height ratio), but the angle I used made the head look tiny and the chest huge.

    I may just have to get that figure because forget-me-nots are my favorite flower. :-D

  6. Kevin Chenevert says:

    Carin still looks great in a bikini, even after the baby! ;0)


Add Comment


Enclosing asterisks marks text as bold (*word*), underscore are made via _word_.
Standard emoticons like :-) and ;-) are converted to images.
E-Mail addresses will not be displayed and will only be used for E-Mail notifications

To prevent automated Bots from commentspamming, please enter the string you see in the image below in the appropriate input box. Your comment will only be submitted if the strings match. Please ensure that your browser supports and accepts cookies, or your comment cannot be verified correctly.
CAPTCHA